Which is cheaper, Qwen 3 Coder or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper at the input + output rate combined: $2.00 versus $2.00 per million tokens.

Which has higher quality, Qwen 3 Coder or Llama 4 Maverick?

Qwen 3 Coder has the higher AA Intelligence Index score: 82 versus 80.

Can I switch between Qwen 3 Coder and Llama 4 Maverick via one API?

Both Qwen 3 Coder and Llama 4 Maverick are accessible through OpenRouter's unified gateway, which lets you switch models with one API key. Phase 2 of AIpricly will add scenario-routed automatic primary + fallback chains.

Qwen 3 Coder vs Llama 4 Maverick

Side-by-side pricing, capabilities, real-world cost across common scenarios, and our editorial pick.

添加模型最多可对比 4 个模型

全部价格按美元 / 百万 token 计

Qwen 3 Coder

Alibaba · released 2026-03-01

Quality (AA Index)82

Input price$0.40

Output price$1.60

Context256K

Throughput180 tok/s

P50 latency0.6s

View full pricing

OVERALL WINNER

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta · released 2026-01-25

Quality (AA Index)80

Input price$0.50

Output price$1.50

Context256K

Throughput220 tok/s

P50 latency0.5s

View full pricing

通过 OpenRouter 试用 Qwen 3 Coder 通过 OpenRouter 试用 Llama 4 Maverick

链接通过我们的 OpenRouter 推荐链接在新标签页打开。查看推广披露

规格对比

绿色列 = 该指标获胜方

Metric	Qwen 3 Coder	Llama 4 Maverick	Verdict
Input price /百万 tokens	$0.40	$0.50	Qwen 3 Coder −20%
Output price /百万 tokens	$1.60	$1.50	Llama 4 Maverick −6%
Context window max input length	256K	256K	Tied
AA Quality AA Intelligence Index (0–100)	82	80	Qwen 3 Coder +2pt
Arena Elo LMArena human-pref Elo (800–2000)	—	—	Tied
Throughput tokens per second	180	220	Llama 4 Maverick +22%
P50 latency first token	0.6s	0.5s	Llama 4 Maverick −17%
Vision multimodal	—
Function calling tool use			Tied
Reasoning mode chain-of-thought	—	—	Tied

常见场景月度费用

默认用量假设

Scenario	Qwen 3 Coder	Llama 4 Maverick
customer support 1000K req · 600/180 tok	$528	$570
chat with docs 300K req · 4000/300 tok	$624	$735
code generation 500K req · 2000/500 tok	$800	$875
voice assistant 600K req · 800/200 tok	$384	$420

Our pick

For most workloads, choose Llama 4 Maverick.

22% faster throughput — matters for streaming UX and voice agents

Best open-weight alternative for self-hosted deployments. Quality lags closed-source frontier but cost-per-token via inference providers is the lowest in the table.

Choose Qwen 3 Coder instead if: 尚未记录这对模型的具体取舍。两者质量差距可能很小，最终决定因素更多是工作负载契合度、集成成本与团队熟悉度。

为何选择？通过智能路由同时使用两者

第二阶段 · 带故障转移链的网关

Set Llama 4 Maverick as primary, Qwen 3 Coder as fallback. One key, one bill, automatic failover when Llama 4 Maverick errors.

第二阶段预览 · 网关尚未上线该接口目前不存在。网关计划在第二阶段上线——下面只是规划中的接口形态预览，不是可用的 API。上线时会通过 newsletter 通知订阅者。

查看计划中的 API 调用形态

$ curl https://api.aipricly.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIPC_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "routing": {
      "primary": "meta/llama-4-maverick",
      "fallback": ["alibaba/qwen-3-coder"]
    },
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
  }'