跳转到主内容
AIpricly

Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3 Coder

Side-by-side pricing, capabilities, real-world cost across common scenarios, and our editorial pick.

添加模型最多可对比 4 个模型
全部价格按美元 / 百万 token 计

Kimi K3

Moonshot · released 2026-03-15

Quality (AA Index)80
Input price$0.30
Output price$1.20
Context200K
Throughput150 tok/s
P50 latency0.8s
OVERALL WINNER

Qwen 3 Coder

Alibaba · released 2026-03-01

Quality (AA Index)82
Input price$0.40
Output price$1.60
Context256K
Throughput180 tok/s
P50 latency0.6s

链接通过我们的 OpenRouter 推荐链接在新标签页打开。 查看推广披露

规格对比

绿色列 = 该指标获胜方
MetricKimi K3Qwen 3 CoderVerdict
Input price
/百万 tokens
$0.30$0.40Kimi K3 −25%
Output price
/百万 tokens
$1.20$1.60Kimi K3 −25%
Context window
max input length
200K256KQwen 3 Coder +1.3×
AA Quality
AA Intelligence Index (0–100)
8082Qwen 3 Coder +2pt
Arena Elo
LMArena human-pref Elo (800–2000)
Tied
Throughput
tokens per second
150180Qwen 3 Coder +20%
P50 latency
first token
0.8s0.6sQwen 3 Coder −25%
Vision
multimodal
Tied
Function calling
tool use
Tied
Reasoning mode
chain-of-thought
Tied

常见场景月度费用

默认用量假设
ScenarioKimi K3Qwen 3 Coder
customer support
1000K req · 600/180 tok
$396$528
chat with docs
300K req · 4000/300 tok
$468$624
code generation
500K req · 2000/500 tok
$600$800
voice assistant
600K req · 800/200 tok
$288$384
Our pick

For most workloads, choose Qwen 3 Coder.

  • 1.3× the context window — better for long documents and agents
  • 20% faster throughput — matters for streaming UX and voice agents
Choose Kimi K3 instead if: 尚未记录这对模型的具体取舍。两者质量差距可能很小,最终决定因素更多是工作负载契合度、集成成本与团队熟悉度。

为何选择?通过智能路由同时使用两者

第二阶段 · 带故障转移链的网关

Set Qwen 3 Coder as primary, Kimi K3 as fallback. One key, one bill, automatic failover when Qwen 3 Coder errors.

第二阶段预览 · 网关尚未上线该接口目前不存在。网关计划在第二阶段上线——下面只是规划中的接口形态预览,不是可用的 API。上线时会通过 newsletter 通知订阅者。
查看计划中的 API 调用形态
$ curl https://api.aipricly.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIPC_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "routing": {
      "primary": "alibaba/qwen-3-coder",
      "fallback": ["moonshot/kimi-k3"]
    },
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
  }'

Related comparisons