跳转到主内容
AIpricly

Mistral Large 3 vs Grok 3

Side-by-side pricing, capabilities, real-world cost across common scenarios, and our editorial pick.

添加模型最多可对比 4 个模型
全部价格按美元 / 百万 token 计
OVERALL WINNER

Mistral Large 3

Mistral · released 2026-02-01

Quality (AA Index)82
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Context128K
Throughput140 tok/s
P50 latency0.9s

Grok 3

xAI · released 2026-02-20

Quality (AA Index)85
Input price$2.50
Output price$12.00
Context128K
Throughput95 tok/s
P50 latency1.4s

链接通过我们的 OpenRouter 推荐链接在新标签页打开。 查看推广披露

规格对比

绿色列 = 该指标获胜方
MetricMistral Large 3Grok 3Verdict
Input price
/百万 tokens
$2.00$2.50Mistral Large 3 −20%
Output price
/百万 tokens
$6.00$12.00Mistral Large 3 −50%
Context window
max input length
128K128KTied
AA Quality
AA Intelligence Index (0–100)
8285Grok 3 +3pt
Arena Elo
LMArena human-pref Elo (800–2000)
Tied
Throughput
tokens per second
14095Mistral Large 3 +47%
P50 latency
first token
0.9s1.4sMistral Large 3 −36%
Vision
multimodal
Function calling
tool use
Tied
Reasoning mode
chain-of-thought

常见场景月度费用

默认用量假设
ScenarioMistral Large 3Grok 3
customer support
1000K req · 600/180 tok
$2.3K$3.7K
chat with docs
300K req · 4000/300 tok
$2.9K$4.1K
code generation
500K req · 2000/500 tok
$3.5K$5.5K
voice assistant
600K req · 800/200 tok
$1.7K$2.6K
Our pick

For most workloads, choose Mistral Large 3.

  • 20% cheaper input price, which compounds at scale
  • 47% faster throughput — matters for streaming UX and voice agents
Choose Grok 3 instead if: 尚未记录这对模型的具体取舍。两者质量差距可能很小,最终决定因素更多是工作负载契合度、集成成本与团队熟悉度。

为何选择?通过智能路由同时使用两者

第二阶段 · 带故障转移链的网关

Set Mistral Large 3 as primary, Grok 3 as fallback. One key, one bill, automatic failover when Mistral Large 3 errors.

第二阶段预览 · 网关尚未上线该接口目前不存在。网关计划在第二阶段上线——下面只是规划中的接口形态预览,不是可用的 API。上线时会通过 newsletter 通知订阅者。
查看计划中的 API 调用形态
$ curl https://api.aipricly.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIPC_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "routing": {
      "primary": "mistral/mistral-large-3",
      "fallback": ["xai/grok-3"]
    },
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
  }'

Related comparisons