跳转到主内容
AIpricly

DeepSeek V3.5 vs Grok 3

Side-by-side pricing, capabilities, real-world cost across common scenarios, and our editorial pick.

添加模型最多可对比 4 个模型
全部价格按美元 / 百万 token 计

DeepSeek V3.5

DeepSeek · released 2025-12-01

Quality (AA Index)81
Input price$0.14
Output price$0.28
Context128K
Throughput95 tok/s
P50 latency1.5s
OVERALL WINNER

Grok 3

xAI · released 2026-02-20

Quality (AA Index)85
Input price$2.50
Output price$12.00
Context128K
Throughput95 tok/s
P50 latency1.4s

链接通过我们的 OpenRouter 推荐链接在新标签页打开。 查看推广披露

规格对比

绿色列 = 该指标获胜方
MetricDeepSeek V3.5Grok 3Verdict
Input price
/百万 tokens
$0.14$2.50DeepSeek V3.5 −94%
Output price
/百万 tokens
$0.28$12.00DeepSeek V3.5 −98%
Context window
max input length
128K128KTied
AA Quality
AA Intelligence Index (0–100)
8185Grok 3 +4pt
Arena Elo
LMArena human-pref Elo (800–2000)
Tied
Throughput
tokens per second
9595Tied
P50 latency
first token
1.5s1.4sGrok 3 −7%
Vision
multimodal
Function calling
tool use
Tied
Reasoning mode
chain-of-thought

常见场景月度费用

默认用量假设
ScenarioDeepSeek V3.5Grok 3
customer support
1000K req · 600/180 tok
$134$3.7K
chat with docs
300K req · 4000/300 tok
$193$4.1K
code generation
500K req · 2000/500 tok
$210$5.5K
voice assistant
600K req · 800/200 tok
$101$2.6K
Our pick

For most workloads, choose Grok 3.

  • Better overall trade-off across the metrics shown
Choose DeepSeek V3.5 instead if: Roughly GPT-4o-class quality at roughly 90% off. Tradeoff is region availability (Chinese provider) and slower output throughput than Western frontier tiers.

阅读完整深度分析

为何选择?通过智能路由同时使用两者

第二阶段 · 带故障转移链的网关

Set Grok 3 as primary, DeepSeek V3.5 as fallback. One key, one bill, automatic failover when Grok 3 errors.

第二阶段预览 · 网关尚未上线该接口目前不存在。网关计划在第二阶段上线——下面只是规划中的接口形态预览,不是可用的 API。上线时会通过 newsletter 通知订阅者。
查看计划中的 API 调用形态
$ curl https://api.aipricly.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIPC_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "routing": {
      "primary": "xai/grok-3",
      "fallback": ["deepseek/deepseek-v3-5"]
    },
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
  }'

Related comparisons