跳转到主内容
AIpricly

DeepSeek R2 vs Qwen 3 Max

Side-by-side pricing, capabilities, real-world cost across common scenarios, and our editorial pick.

添加模型最多可对比 4 个模型
全部价格按美元 / 百万 token 计
OVERALL WINNER

DeepSeek R2

DeepSeek · released 2026-02-15

Quality (AA Index)86
Input price$0.55
Output price$2.20
Context128K
Throughput110 tok/s
P50 latency1.2s

Qwen 3 Max

Alibaba · released 2026-03-01

Quality (AA Index)84
Input price$0.80
Output price$3.20
Context256K
Throughput130 tok/s
P50 latency0.9s

链接通过我们的 OpenRouter 推荐链接在新标签页打开。 查看推广披露

规格对比

绿色列 = 该指标获胜方
MetricDeepSeek R2Qwen 3 MaxVerdict
Input price
/百万 tokens
$0.55$0.80DeepSeek R2 −31%
Output price
/百万 tokens
$2.20$3.20DeepSeek R2 −31%
Context window
max input length
128K256KQwen 3 Max +2.0×
AA Quality
AA Intelligence Index (0–100)
8684DeepSeek R2 +2pt
Arena Elo
LMArena human-pref Elo (800–2000)
Tied
Throughput
tokens per second
110130Qwen 3 Max +18%
P50 latency
first token
1.2s0.9sQwen 3 Max −25%
Vision
multimodal
Function calling
tool use
Tied
Reasoning mode
chain-of-thought

常见场景月度费用

默认用量假设
ScenarioDeepSeek R2Qwen 3 Max
customer support
1000K req · 600/180 tok
$726$1.1K
chat with docs
300K req · 4000/300 tok
$858$1.2K
code generation
500K req · 2000/500 tok
$1.1K$1.6K
voice assistant
600K req · 800/200 tok
$528$768
Our pick

For most workloads, choose DeepSeek R2.

  • 31% cheaper input price, which compounds at scale
Choose Qwen 3 Max instead if: 尚未记录这对模型的具体取舍。两者质量差距可能很小,最终决定因素更多是工作负载契合度、集成成本与团队熟悉度。

为何选择?通过智能路由同时使用两者

第二阶段 · 带故障转移链的网关

Set DeepSeek R2 as primary, Qwen 3 Max as fallback. One key, one bill, automatic failover when DeepSeek R2 errors.

第二阶段预览 · 网关尚未上线该接口目前不存在。网关计划在第二阶段上线——下面只是规划中的接口形态预览,不是可用的 API。上线时会通过 newsletter 通知订阅者。
查看计划中的 API 调用形态
$ curl https://api.aipricly.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIPC_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "routing": {
      "primary": "deepseek/deepseek-r2",
      "fallback": ["alibaba/qwen-3-max"]
    },
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
  }'

Related comparisons