Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at the input + output rate combined: $0.800 versus $6.00 per million tokens.

Which has higher quality, Llama 4 Scout or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the higher AA Intelligence Index score: 79 versus 75.

Can I switch between Llama 4 Scout and Claude Haiku 4.5 via one API?

Both Llama 4 Scout and Claude Haiku 4.5 are accessible through OpenRouter's unified gateway, which lets you switch models with one API key. Phase 2 of AIpricly will add scenario-routed automatic primary + fallback chains.

Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Side-by-side pricing, capabilities, real-world cost across common scenarios, and our editorial pick.

Add a modelUp to 4 models can be compared

all prices in USD per 1M tokens

OVERALL WINNER

Llama 4 Scout

Meta · released 2026-01-25

Quality (AA Index)75

Input price$0.20

Output price$0.60

Context256K

Throughput380 tok/s

P50 latency0.2s

View full pricing

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic · released 2026-04-08

Quality (AA Index)79

Input price$1.00

Output price$5.00

Context200K

Throughput250 tok/s

P50 latency0.4s

View full pricing

Try Llama 4 Scout on OpenRouter Try Claude Haiku 4.5 on OpenRouter

Links open in a new tab via our OpenRouter referral. Affiliate disclosure

Head-to-head specs

Green column = winner per metric

Metric	Llama 4 Scout	Claude Haiku 4.5	Verdict
Input price /1M tokens	$0.20	$1.00	Llama 4 Scout −80%
Output price /1M tokens	$0.60	$5.00	Llama 4 Scout −88%
Context window max input length	256K	200K	Llama 4 Scout +1.3×
AA Quality AA Intelligence Index (0–100)	75	79	Claude Haiku 4.5 +4pt
Arena Elo LMArena human-pref Elo (800–2000)	—	—	Tied
Throughput tokens per second	380	250	Llama 4 Scout +52%
P50 latency first token	0.2s	0.4s	Llama 4 Scout −50%
Vision multimodal	—
Function calling tool use			Tied
Reasoning mode chain-of-thought	—

Monthly cost across common scenarios

Default usage assumptions

Scenario	Llama 4 Scout	Claude Haiku 4.5
customer support 1000K req · 600/180 tok	$228	$1.5K
chat with docs 300K req · 4000/300 tok	$294	$1.6K
code generation 500K req · 2000/500 tok	$350	$2.3K
voice assistant 600K req · 800/200 tok	$168	$1.1K

Our pick

For most workloads, choose Llama 4 Scout.

80% cheaper input price, which compounds at scale
1.3× the context window — better for long documents and agents
52% faster throughput — matters for streaming UX and voice agents

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 instead if: Anthropic’s economy tier — gentler tone, stronger safety patterns than mainstream tiny models. Choose when output voice matters more than raw IQ.

Read our deep analysis

The Cheapest LLM API for Production in 2026

Why pick? Use both with smart routing

Phase 2 · gateway with fallback chain

Set Llama 4 Scout as primary, Claude Haiku 4.5 as fallback. One key, one bill, automatic failover when Llama 4 Scout errors.

PHASE 2 PREVIEW · gateway not live yetThis endpoint does not exist yet. The gateway is in Phase 2 — what you see below is a design preview of the planned interface, not a live API. We will email subscribers when it launches.

Preview the planned API call

$ curl https://api.aipricly.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIPC_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "routing": {
      "primary": "meta/llama-4-scout",
      "fallback": ["anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5"]
    },
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
  }'