Skip to main content
AIpricly

Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Large 3

Side-by-side pricing, capabilities, real-world cost across common scenarios, and our editorial pick.

Add a modelUp to 4 models can be compared
all prices in USD per 1M tokens
OVERALL WINNER

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta · released 2026-01-25

Quality (AA Index)80
Input price$0.50
Output price$1.50
Context256K
Throughput220 tok/s
P50 latency0.5s

Mistral Large 3

Mistral · released 2026-02-01

Quality (AA Index)82
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Context128K
Throughput140 tok/s
P50 latency0.9s

Links open in a new tab via our OpenRouter referral. Affiliate disclosure

Head-to-head specs

Green column = winner per metric
MetricLlama 4 MaverickMistral Large 3Verdict
Input price
/1M tokens
$0.50$2.00Llama 4 Maverick −75%
Output price
/1M tokens
$1.50$6.00Llama 4 Maverick −75%
Context window
max input length
256K128KLlama 4 Maverick +2.0×
AA Quality
AA Intelligence Index (0–100)
8082Mistral Large 3 +2pt
Arena Elo
LMArena human-pref Elo (800–2000)
Tied
Throughput
tokens per second
220140Llama 4 Maverick +57%
P50 latency
first token
0.5s0.9sLlama 4 Maverick −44%
Vision
multimodal
Function calling
tool use
Tied
Reasoning mode
chain-of-thought
Tied

Monthly cost across common scenarios

Default usage assumptions
ScenarioLlama 4 MaverickMistral Large 3
customer support
1000K req · 600/180 tok
$570$2.3K
chat with docs
300K req · 4000/300 tok
$735$2.9K
code generation
500K req · 2000/500 tok
$875$3.5K
voice assistant
600K req · 800/200 tok
$420$1.7K
Our pick

For most workloads, choose Llama 4 Maverick.

  • 75% cheaper input price, which compounds at scale
  • 2.0× the context window — better for long documents and agents
  • 57% faster throughput — matters for streaming UX and voice agents

Best open-weight alternative for self-hosted deployments. Quality lags closed-source frontier but cost-per-token via inference providers is the lowest in the table.

Choose Mistral Large 3 instead if: Tradeoffs for this pair have not yet been documented. The quality difference may be small enough that workload fit, integration cost, and team familiarity decide the choice.

Why pick? Use both with smart routing

Phase 2 · gateway with fallback chain

Set Llama 4 Maverick as primary, Mistral Large 3 as fallback. One key, one bill, automatic failover when Llama 4 Maverick errors.

PHASE 2 PREVIEW · gateway not live yetThis endpoint does not exist yet. The gateway is in Phase 2 — what you see below is a design preview of the planned interface, not a live API. We will email subscribers when it launches.
Preview the planned API call
$ curl https://api.aipricly.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIPC_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "routing": {
      "primary": "meta/llama-4-maverick",
      "fallback": ["mistral/mistral-large-3"]
    },
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
  }'

Related comparisons